The recent conflict between Iran and Israel, which concluded with a ceasefire despite ongoing US strikes, has challenged the notion of rigid global power blocs reminiscent of the Cold War. During the 12-day confrontation, Iran's traditional partners, China and Russia, notably kept their distance and refrained from providing military support, offering little more than verbal statements. This has exposed the limitations of the so-called 'axis' of authoritarian states, which some US and UK officials had suggested included Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. Analysts, including Alexander Gabuev of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, emphasize that these countries do not share the same institutional ties or values as Western allies, and the idea of a cohesive rival bloc remains largely a narrative rather than a binding alliance. Despite setbacks, Iran demonstrated formidable retaliatory capabilities through its ballistic missile arsenal, reportedly numbering over 2,000, which caused damage and casualties in Israel. Israel claims full control of Iranian airspace, enhancing its targeting capabilities, but Iran’s missile strikes underscored its strategic effectiveness. The conflict has weakened Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' and highlighted internal challenges, with Israel’s air dominance and intelligence operations penetrating deeply into Iran’s theological and political structures. Experts suggest that only nuclear capability may guarantee Iran’s future sovereignty. Commentary also points to Iran’s potential strategic positioning as a de facto nuclear power without officially acquiring nuclear weapons.