The United States and Israel are divided over how to capitalise on last month’s strikes that damaged Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, according to Western and regional diplomats cited by Reuters. While both President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the June attacks as a tactical victory, they differ sharply on the next steps. Trump is pressing to revive nuclear talks with Tehran, viewing diplomacy as the fastest route to ensuring Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. Advisers say the White House hopes to translate the military pressure into a limited agreement that could eventually allow sanctions relief and restore economic ties. Netanyahu, by contrast, wants to intensify military pressure and is prepared to push toward what aides call the “Libya model,” requiring Iran to dismantle its nuclear and missile facilities under strict international oversight. Israeli officials believe sustained or heavier strikes may be necessary—and acknowledge they would need at least a U.S. green light to proceed—if Tehran resists sweeping concessions. The split extends to other regional issues: Washington is promoting a Gaza cease-fire, whereas Jerusalem insists on the complete dismantling of Hamas. Diplomats warn the divergent goals leave the allies without a clear joint endgame, heightening uncertainty over how far either side is willing to go should Iran rebuild or accelerate its nuclear programme.